A little introduction to the history of the violin bass. Asked about the make of the first violin bass of the world, many self-styled experts say immediately: "Gibson with the EB-1". Perhaps it's not the wrong answer but already the question is wrong if we don't define precisely what a violin bass exactly is. You don't have to saw through a violin body to find out that it's hollow. This hollowbody is part of the principles used for these instruments to generate their distinctive sound. So let's find out, which of the first violin basses really deserves this term. Gibson EB-1 After
World War II the onset of rock and roll music adamently demanded new
musical instruments and as soon as Rickenbackers 'Frying Pan'
turned into the first public available electric guitar, the double-bass men often had a
problem to be heard in the mix. | |
One
of Fenders Competitors during these times was the successor of the 1918 departed Orville Gibson, who noticed the
sluggish sales of the precision bass and decided to offer
something to the market that could trick the mental refusal of the bass
players. It's a fact, that Gibson already experimented with an electrical upright bass
in 1938, but during WWII they didn't continue its developments and the two
prototypes vanished in the storeroom. Remembering that project the
company eventually came out with their own model of
a sort of 'precision' bass (Fender had called it 'Precision'
because
it was the first
fretted bass that should give guitarists a familiar feeling) but
keeping the shape as close as possible to the well known double-bass.
Needless to say that
they had to make its body smaller as it first of all should be bearable
for
those willing to try the new way of bass playing. | ![]() EB-1 1955 |
No one really can deny that a solid piece of wood, weighing 11,681lbs (5,3kg) and an attachable iron bar on its bottom has nothing to do with a fragile violin. The saw that left a violin-shape in the timber didn't hollow it out and therefore the result wasn't actually a violin-like body and therefore the instrument definitely wasn't a violin bass! Less important but perhaps worth mentioning is the fact, that a delicate hollow body would have been problematic with holding the upright stand. As far as I know, this is why only few attempts were made in this direction e.g. by Crown or Egmond/Lion using an end-to-end sustain block in the middle of the body that virtually eliminated the lightweight advantage.
| |
The clones Only few people realize that apart from the Fender Jazz- and Precision Basses, the 500/1 is one of the most copied basses worldwide. This is particularily remarkable because it is much more labourious and costly to build a hollowbody than a solidbody bass. These time-consuming processes were the reason, why companies pondered passionately about possibilities to lower the costs of violin bass production. The result of the search after the cheapest stick that looked at least a little bit like a Hofner was the development of several methods, the most progessive is still used with most China and Korean makes. While in the sixties, the numerous Violin Basses from Japan were mostly products of solid craftsmanship, some of them with beautiful own faces and a respectable useability as a musical instrument, the majority of the modern versions are children of the faster-cheaper-nicer society. |
Learn more about the four most common methods to make a body for a violin bass. |
| At
the moment I show more than 200 different violin basses in the gallery and as a bonus some violin shaped solidbodies and violin guitars and the number increases... Some are beautiful, some are crappy but all of them try to make us reflect on a swinging time when the beat came up... |